↓ Skip to main content

The effectiveness of interventions to change six health behaviours: a review of reviews

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, September 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
4 policy sources
twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
283 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
803 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The effectiveness of interventions to change six health behaviours: a review of reviews
Published in
BMC Public Health, September 2010
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-10-538
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ruth G Jepson, Fiona M Harris, Stephen Platt, Carol Tannahill

Abstract

Several World Health Organisation reports over recent years have highlighted the high incidence of chronic diseases such as diabetes, coronary heart disease and cancer. Contributory factors include unhealthy diets, alcohol and tobacco use and sedentary lifestyles. This paper reports the findings of a review of reviews of behavioural change interventions to reduce unhealthy behaviours or promote healthy behaviours. We included six different health-related behaviours in the review: healthy eating, physical exercise, smoking, alcohol misuse, sexual risk taking (in young people) and illicit drug use. We excluded reviews which focussed on pharmacological treatments or those which required intensive treatments (e.g. for drug or alcohol dependency).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 803 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 15 2%
United States 6 <1%
Germany 3 <1%
Portugal 2 <1%
Switzerland 2 <1%
Mexico 2 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Other 8 <1%
Unknown 762 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 157 20%
Researcher 123 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 113 14%
Student > Bachelor 56 7%
Other 52 6%
Other 188 23%
Unknown 114 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 153 19%
Psychology 111 14%
Social Sciences 109 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 92 11%
Unspecified 30 4%
Other 161 20%
Unknown 147 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 November 2022.
All research outputs
#2,248,850
of 24,397,600 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#2,551
of 16,119 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,331
of 98,931 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#15
of 81 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,397,600 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,119 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 98,931 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 81 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.