You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
An artificial intelligence tool to predict fluid requirement in the intensive care unit: a proof-of-concept study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, December 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1186/cc7140 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Leo Anthony Celi, L Hinske Christian, Gil Alterovitz, Peter Szolovits |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 1 | 50% |
| United States | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 136 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 128 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 24 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 20 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 14% |
| Other | 12 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 7% |
| Other | 28 | 21% |
| Unknown | 24 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 36 | 26% |
| Computer Science | 28 | 21% |
| Engineering | 17 | 13% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 13 | 10% |
| Unknown | 37 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 August 2017.
All research outputs
#15,516,483
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#5,088
of 6,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#149,681
of 179,590 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#18
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 179,590 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.