↓ Skip to main content

An artificial intelligence tool to predict fluid requirement in the intensive care unit: a proof-of-concept study

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, December 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
135 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
An artificial intelligence tool to predict fluid requirement in the intensive care unit: a proof-of-concept study
Published in
Critical Care, December 2008
DOI 10.1186/cc7140
Authors

Leo Anthony Celi, L Hinske Christian, Gil Alterovitz, Peter Szolovits, Leo Anthony Celi, L Hinske Christian, Gil Alterovitz, Peter Szolovits

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 135 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 4%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Unknown 127 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 23 17%
Student > Master 21 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 14%
Other 11 8%
Student > Bachelor 9 7%
Other 27 20%
Unknown 25 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 36 27%
Computer Science 27 20%
Engineering 17 13%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 1%
Other 11 8%
Unknown 38 28%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 August 2017.
All research outputs
#13,874,077
of 22,996,001 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#4,666
of 6,087 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#136,774
of 166,829 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#69
of 94 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,996,001 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,087 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.4. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 166,829 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 94 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.