Title |
Clinical diagnostic value of simultaneous amplification and testing for the diagnosis of sputum-scarce pulmonary tuberculosis
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Infectious Diseases, August 2017
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12879-017-2647-7 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Liping Yan, Qing Zhang, Heping Xiao |
Abstract |
Since 20% of pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB) patients are asymptomatic, the early detection of PTB is a challenge particularly in sputum-scarce patients and diagnostic accuracy based solely on clinical characteristics and chest X-ray/CT scans are not always satisfactory. The AmpSure simultaneous amplification and testing method for the detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (SAT-TB assay) is an alternative approach to diagnose PTB. In the present study, we analyzed the usefulness of the SAT-TB assay for PTB diagnosis in sputum-scarce patients. A total of 840 patients were prospectively enrolled for PTB diagnosis with bronchial alveolar lavage fluid (BALF) used as the samples for the SAT-TB assay. Of these, 536 had a definite diagnosis of PTB confirmed by positive microbiology culture, or clinical diagnosis of active PTB following anti-TB treatment with a favorable response. The SAT-TB assay showed a 76.44% agreement with the culture test. The sensitivity and specificity of the SAT-TB assay were 50.75% and 94.73%, respectively. The sensitivity of SAT-TB was significantly higher than that of BALF cultures (21.64%) (X(2) = 49.1503; P < 0.001) and smears (4.48%) (X(2) = 175.2315; P < 0.001). The specificity of SAT-TB was slightly lower than that of BALF cultures (98.25%) (X(2) = 2.0727; P = 0.150) and smears (98.25%) (X(2) = 2.0727; P = 0.150). The accuracy rates were 63.87% for SAT-TB, 44.50% for BALF cultures and 29.84% for BALF smears. The high accuracy of the SAT-TB assay indicated that active PTB is present and anti-TB treatment is strongly recommended regardless of smear and culture test results for sputum scarce active PTB suspected patients when BALF SAT-TB is positive. |
Twitter Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 25% |
Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 25% |
Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 19 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 4 | 21% |
Lecturer | 3 | 16% |
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 16% |
Researcher | 2 | 11% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 5% |
Other | 2 | 11% |
Unknown | 4 | 21% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 21% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 21% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 11% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 5% |
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 5% |
Other | 2 | 11% |
Unknown | 5 | 26% |