You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
2017 update of the WSES guidelines for emergency repair of complicated abdominal wall hernias
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
World Journal of Emergency Surgery, August 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13017-017-0149-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Arianna Birindelli, Massimo Sartelli, Salomone Di Saverio, Federico Coccolini, Luca Ansaloni, Gabrielle H. van Ramshorst, Giampiero Campanelli, Vladimir Khokha, Ernest E. Moore, Andrew Peitzman, George Velmahos, Frederick Alan Moore, Ari Leppaniemi, Clay Cothren Burlew, Walter L. Biffl, Kaoru Koike, Yoram Kluger, Gustavo P. Fraga, Carlos A. Ordonez, Matteo Novello, Ferdinando Agresta, Boris Sakakushev, Igor Gerych, Imtiaz Wani, Michael D. Kelly, Carlos Augusto Gomes, Mario Paulo Faro, Antonio Tarasconi, Zaza Demetrashvili, Jae Gil Lee, Nereo Vettoretto, Gianluca Guercioni, Roberto Persiani, Cristian Tranà, Yunfeng Cui, Kenneth Y. Y. Kok, Wagih M. Ghnnam, Ashraf El-Sayed Abbas, Norio Sato, Sanjay Marwah, Muthukumaran Rangarajan, Offir Ben-Ishay, Abdul Rashid K Adesunkanmi, Helmut Alfredo Segovia Lohse, Jakub Kenig, Stefano Mandalà, Raul Coimbra, Aneel Bhangu, Nigel Suggett, Antonio Biondi, Nazario Portolani, Gianluca Baiocchi, Andrew W Kirkpatrick, Rodolfo Scibé, Michael Sugrue, Osvaldo Chiara, Fausto Catena |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 55 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 8 | 15% |
| Spain | 8 | 15% |
| Colombia | 6 | 11% |
| Italy | 5 | 9% |
| United States | 2 | 4% |
| Argentina | 2 | 4% |
| El Salvador | 1 | 2% |
| Ecuador | 1 | 2% |
| Pakistan | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 9% |
| Unknown | 16 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 27 | 49% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 17 | 31% |
| Scientists | 6 | 11% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 5 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 290 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 290 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Postgraduate | 36 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 28 | 10% |
| Other | 27 | 9% |
| Researcher | 27 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 21 | 7% |
| Other | 53 | 18% |
| Unknown | 98 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 153 | 53% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 1% |
| Engineering | 4 | 1% |
| Computer Science | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 13 | 4% |
| Unknown | 109 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 34. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 September 2019.
All research outputs
#1,204,796
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from World Journal of Emergency Surgery
#35
of 616 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,891
of 331,444 outputs
Outputs of similar age from World Journal of Emergency Surgery
#2
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 616 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,444 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.