↓ Skip to main content

Use of complementary and alternative medicine by those with a chronic disease and the general population - results of a national population based survey

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies, October 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
145 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
173 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Use of complementary and alternative medicine by those with a chronic disease and the general population - results of a national population based survey
Published in
BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies, October 2010
DOI 10.1186/1472-6882-10-58
Pubmed ID
Authors

Amy Metcalfe, Jeanne Williams, Jane McChesney, Scott B Patten, Nathalie Jetté

Abstract

The use of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) is becoming more common, but population-based descriptions of its patterns of use are lacking. This study aimed to determine the prevalence of CAM use in the general population and for those with asthma, diabetes, epilepsy and migraine.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 173 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 3%
Canada 2 1%
Germany 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Other 2 1%
Unknown 157 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 34 20%
Student > Bachelor 26 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 10%
Researcher 16 9%
Other 13 8%
Other 44 25%
Unknown 22 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 73 42%
Nursing and Health Professions 23 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 7%
Psychology 8 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 8 5%
Other 22 13%
Unknown 27 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 August 2019.
All research outputs
#1,850,638
of 22,755,127 outputs
Outputs from BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies
#323
of 3,621 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,998
of 99,159 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies
#4
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,755,127 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,621 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 99,159 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.