↓ Skip to main content

Internet-versus group-administered cognitive behaviour therapy for panic disorder in a psychiatric setting: a randomised trial

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Psychiatry, July 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
164 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
293 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Internet-versus group-administered cognitive behaviour therapy for panic disorder in a psychiatric setting: a randomised trial
Published in
BMC Psychiatry, July 2010
DOI 10.1186/1471-244x-10-54
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jan Bergström, Gerhard Andersson, Brjánn Ljótsson, Christian Rück, Sergej Andréewitch, Andreas Karlsson, Per Carlbring, Erik Andersson, Nils Lindefors

Abstract

Internet administered cognitive behaviour therapy (CBT) is a promising new way to deliver psychological treatment, but its effectiveness in regular care settings and in relation to more traditional CBT group treatment has not yet been determined. The primary aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of Internet-and group administered CBT for panic disorder (with or without agoraphobia) in a randomised trial within a regular psychiatric care setting. The second aim of the study was to establish the cost-effectiveness of these interventions.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 293 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Sweden 5 2%
United Kingdom 5 2%
United States 2 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 279 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 55 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 52 18%
Researcher 39 13%
Student > Bachelor 32 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 20 7%
Other 61 21%
Unknown 34 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 134 46%
Medicine and Dentistry 42 14%
Social Sciences 17 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 2%
Other 24 8%
Unknown 55 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 35. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 March 2022.
All research outputs
#1,015,808
of 23,613,071 outputs
Outputs from BMC Psychiatry
#283
of 4,908 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,036
of 95,496 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Psychiatry
#3
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,613,071 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,908 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 95,496 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.