You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Nerve growth factor improves functional recovery by inhibiting endoplasmic reticulum stress-induced neuronal apoptosis in rats with spinal cord injury
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Translational Medicine, May 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1479-5876-12-130 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Hongyu Zhang, Fenzan Wu, Xiaoxia Kong, Jie Yang, Huijun Chen, Liancheng Deng, Yi Cheng, Libing Ye, Sipin Zhu, Xie Zhang, Zhouguang Wang, Hongxue Shi, Xiaobing Fu, Xiaokun Li, Huazi Xu, Li Lin, Jian Xiao |
| Abstract |
Endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress-induced apoptosis plays a major role in various diseases, including spinal cord injury (SCI). Nerve growth factor (NGF) show neuroprotective effect and improve the recovery of SCI, but the relations of ER stress-induced apoptosis and the NGF therapeutic effect in SCI still unclear. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 80 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Romania | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 79 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 21% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 13% |
| Researcher | 7 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 14 | 18% |
| Unknown | 15 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 19 | 24% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 14% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 11% |
| Neuroscience | 9 | 11% |
| Engineering | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 6 | 8% |
| Unknown | 21 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 June 2014.
All research outputs
#18,371,959
of 22,755,127 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Translational Medicine
#2,943
of 3,978 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#163,872
of 226,949 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Translational Medicine
#36
of 72 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,755,127 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,978 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 226,949 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 72 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.