↓ Skip to main content

Local sequence and sequencing depth dependent accuracy of RNA-seq reads

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Bioinformatics, August 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Local sequence and sequencing depth dependent accuracy of RNA-seq reads
Published in
BMC Bioinformatics, August 2017
DOI 10.1186/s12859-017-1780-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Guoshuai Cai, Shoudan Liang, Xiaofeng Zheng, Feifei Xiao

Abstract

Many biases and spurious effects are inherent in RNA-seq technology, resulting in a non-uniform distribution of sequencing read counts for each base position in a gene. Therefore, a base-level strategy is required to model the non-uniformity. Also, the properties of sequencing read counts can be leveraged to achieve a more precise estimation of the mean and variance of measurement. In this study, we aimed to unveil the effects on RNA-seq accuracy from multiple factors and develop accurate modeling of RNA-seq reads in comparison. We found that the overdispersion rate decreased when sequencing depth increased on the base level. Moreover, the influence of local sequence(s) on the overdispersion rate was notable but no longer significant after adjusting the effect from sequencing depth. Based on these findings, we propose a desirable beta-binomial model with a dynamic overdispersion rate on the base-level proportion of sequencing read counts from two samples. The current study provides thorough insights into the impact of overdispersion at the position level and especially into its relationship with sequencing depth, local sequence, and preparation protocol. These properties of RNA-seq will aid in improvement of the quality control procedure and development of statistical methods for RNA-seq downstream analyses.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 36 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 33%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 25%
Student > Master 4 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 8%
Student > Bachelor 1 3%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 4 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 39%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 8%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 3%
Computer Science 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 6 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 November 2017.
All research outputs
#2,925,332
of 22,792,160 outputs
Outputs from BMC Bioinformatics
#1,024
of 7,280 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,773
of 317,353 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Bioinformatics
#10
of 87 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,792,160 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,280 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 317,353 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 87 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.