↓ Skip to main content

Neuromuscular training and muscle strengthening in patients with patellofemoral pain syndrome: a protocol of randomized controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (54th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
418 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Neuromuscular training and muscle strengthening in patients with patellofemoral pain syndrome: a protocol of randomized controlled trial
Published in
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, May 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2474-15-157
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nayra Deise dos Anjos Rabelo, Bruna Lima, Amir Curcio dos Reis, André Serra Bley, Liu Chiao Yi, Thiago Yukio Fukuda, Leonardo Oliveira Pena Costa, Paulo Roberto Garcia Lucareli

Abstract

Patellofemoral pain syndrome (PFPS) is a common musculoskeletal condition, particularly among women. Patients with PFPS usually experience weakness in the gluteal muscles, as well as pain and impaired motor control during activities of daily living. Strengthening the hip muscles is an effective way of treating this disorder. Neuromuscular training has also been identified as a therapeutic tool, although the benefits of this intervention in patients with PFPS patients remain inconclusive.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 418 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Malaysia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 415 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 84 20%
Student > Master 80 19%
Student > Postgraduate 32 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 17 4%
Other 51 12%
Unknown 131 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 107 26%
Nursing and Health Professions 70 17%
Sports and Recreations 51 12%
Neuroscience 7 2%
Engineering 6 1%
Other 27 6%
Unknown 150 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 April 2020.
All research outputs
#7,444,323
of 22,756,196 outputs
Outputs from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#1,521
of 4,037 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#73,849
of 227,068 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#32
of 100 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,756,196 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,037 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 227,068 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 100 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.