↓ Skip to main content

A focus group study of healthy eating knowledge, practices, and barriers among adult and adolescent immigrants and refugees in the United States

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
78 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
430 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A focus group study of healthy eating knowledge, practices, and barriers among adult and adolescent immigrants and refugees in the United States
Published in
International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, May 2014
DOI 10.1186/1479-5868-11-63
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kristina Tiedje, Mark L Wieland, Sonja J Meiers, Ahmed A Mohamed, Christine M Formea, Jennifer L Ridgeway, Gladys B Asiedu, Ginny Boyum, Jennifer A Weis, Julie A Nigon, Christi A Patten, Irene G Sia

Abstract

Immigrants and refugees to the United States exhibit lower dietary quality than the general population, but reasons for this disparity are poorly understood. In this study, we describe the meanings of food, health and wellbeing through the reported dietary preferences, beliefs, and practices of adults and adolescents from four immigrant and refugee communities in the Midwestern United States.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 430 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 426 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 92 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 58 13%
Researcher 49 11%
Student > Bachelor 37 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 36 8%
Other 75 17%
Unknown 83 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 70 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 67 16%
Social Sciences 66 15%
Psychology 40 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 29 7%
Other 53 12%
Unknown 105 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 September 2016.
All research outputs
#13,060,386
of 22,756,196 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
#1,657
of 1,925 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#107,830
of 227,068 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
#24
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,756,196 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,925 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.4. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 227,068 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.