You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
TINA manual landmarking tool: software for the precise digitization of 3D landmarks
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Zoology, April 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1742-9994-9-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Anja C Schunke, Paul A Bromiley, Diethard Tautz, Neil A Thacker |
| Abstract |
Interest in the placing of landmarks and subsequent morphometric analyses of shape for 3D data has increased with the increasing accessibility of computed tomography (CT) scanners. However, current computer programs for this task suffer from various practical drawbacks. We present here a free software tool that overcomes many of these problems. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 2 | 40% |
| Thailand | 1 | 20% |
| United States | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 1 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 80% |
| Scientists | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Portugal | 2 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 3% |
| Bulgaria | 1 | 1% |
| Brazil | 1 | 1% |
| Argentina | 1 | 1% |
| Spain | 1 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 60 | 87% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 17 | 25% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 14% |
| Professor | 4 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 16 | 23% |
| Unknown | 7 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 35 | 51% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 7% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 5 | 7% |
| Computer Science | 4 | 6% |
| Environmental Science | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 9 | 13% |
| Unknown | 8 | 12% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 April 2020.
All research outputs
#7,778,510
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Zoology
#361
of 695 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,079
of 173,560 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Zoology
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 695 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.9. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 173,560 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.