↓ Skip to main content

Prevalence and risk factors for periprosthetic fracture in older recipients of total hip replacement: a cohort study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
49 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
68 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Prevalence and risk factors for periprosthetic fracture in older recipients of total hip replacement: a cohort study
Published in
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, May 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2474-15-168
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jeffrey N Katz, Elizabeth A Wright, Julian JZ Polaris, Mitchel B Harris, Elena Losina

Abstract

The growing utilization of total joint replacement will increase the frequency of its complications, including periprosthetic fracture. The prevalence and risk factors of periprosthetic fracture require further study, particularly over the course of long-term follow-up. The objective of this study was to estimate the prevalence and risk factors for periprosthetic fractures occurring in recipients of total hip replacement.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 3%
Colombia 1 1%
Unknown 65 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 15%
Researcher 9 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 10%
Student > Bachelor 7 10%
Other 7 10%
Other 19 28%
Unknown 9 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 41 60%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 9%
Engineering 6 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 1%
Social Sciences 1 1%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 10 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 May 2014.
All research outputs
#15,301,167
of 22,756,196 outputs
Outputs from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#2,453
of 4,037 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#132,645
of 226,264 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#57
of 96 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,756,196 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,037 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 226,264 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 96 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.