↓ Skip to main content

Advances in closed-loop deep brain stimulation devices

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, August 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
170 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
368 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Advances in closed-loop deep brain stimulation devices
Published in
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, August 2017
DOI 10.1186/s12984-017-0295-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mahboubeh Parastarfeizabadi, Abbas Z. Kouzani

Abstract

Millions of patients around the world are affected by neurological and psychiatric disorders. Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is a device-based therapy that could have fewer side-effects and higher efficiencies in drug-resistant patients compared to other therapeutic options such as pharmacological approaches. Thus far, several efforts have been made to incorporate a feedback loop into DBS devices to make them operate in a closed-loop manner. This paper presents a comprehensive investigation into the existing research-based and commercial closed-loop DBS devices. It describes a brief history of closed-loop DBS techniques, biomarkers and algorithms used for closing the feedback loop, components of the current research-based and commercial closed-loop DBS devices, and advancements and challenges in this field of research. This review also includes a comparison of the closed-loop DBS devices and provides the future directions of this area of research. Although we are in the early stages of the closed-loop DBS approach, there have been fruitful efforts in design and development of closed-loop DBS devices. To date, only one commercial closed-loop DBS device has been manufactured. However, this system does not have an intelligent and patient dependent control algorithm. A closed-loop DBS device requires a control algorithm to learn and optimize the stimulation parameters according to the brain clinical state. The promising clinical effects of open-loop DBS have been demonstrated, indicating DBS as a pioneer technology and treatment option to serve neurological patients. However, like other commercial devices, DBS needs to be automated and modernized.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 368 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 368 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 66 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 53 14%
Student > Bachelor 45 12%
Student > Master 38 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 19 5%
Other 52 14%
Unknown 95 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 91 25%
Neuroscience 57 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 37 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 4%
Computer Science 15 4%
Other 47 13%
Unknown 106 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 September 2022.
All research outputs
#6,857,405
of 24,378,498 outputs
Outputs from Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
#409
of 1,352 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#103,650
of 322,182 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
#9
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,378,498 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,352 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 322,182 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.