↓ Skip to main content

An Italian prospective multicenter survey on patients suspected of having non-celiac gluten sensitivity

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medicine, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
10 news outlets
blogs
7 blogs
twitter
29 X users
facebook
44 Facebook pages
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user
video
3 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
272 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
377 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
An Italian prospective multicenter survey on patients suspected of having non-celiac gluten sensitivity
Published in
BMC Medicine, May 2014
DOI 10.1186/1741-7015-12-85
Pubmed ID
Authors

Umberto Volta, Maria Teresa Bardella, Antonino Calabrò, Riccardo Troncone, Gino Roberto Corazza, The Study Group for Non-Celiac Gluten Sensitivity

Abstract

Non-celiac gluten sensitivity (NCGS) is still an undefined syndrome with several unsettled issues despite the increasing awareness of its existence. We carried out a prospective survey on NCGS in Italian centers for the diagnosis of gluten-related disorders, with the aim of defining the clinical picture of this new syndrome and to establish roughly its prevalence compared with celiac disease.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 29 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 377 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 2 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Greece 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 371 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 68 18%
Student > Master 53 14%
Researcher 44 12%
Other 30 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 5%
Other 67 18%
Unknown 97 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 110 29%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 40 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 39 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 4%
Neuroscience 9 2%
Other 52 14%
Unknown 113 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 160. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 February 2024.
All research outputs
#255,040
of 25,390,692 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medicine
#225
of 4,005 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,017
of 239,626 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medicine
#5
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,390,692 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,005 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 45.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 239,626 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.