↓ Skip to main content

Copy number variants are a common cause of non-syndromic hearing loss

Overview of attention for article published in Genome Medicine, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
153 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
108 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Copy number variants are a common cause of non-syndromic hearing loss
Published in
Genome Medicine, May 2014
DOI 10.1186/gm554
Pubmed ID
Authors

A Eliot Shearer, Diana L Kolbe, Hela Azaiez, Christina M Sloan, Kathy L Frees, Amy E Weaver, Erika T Clark, Carla J Nishimura, E Ann Black-Ziegelbein, Richard J H Smith

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 108 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 1 <1%
Unknown 107 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 17%
Student > Master 16 15%
Researcher 13 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 8%
Student > Postgraduate 9 8%
Other 19 18%
Unknown 24 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 28 26%
Medicine and Dentistry 24 22%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 14%
Environmental Science 2 2%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 2%
Other 5 5%
Unknown 32 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 April 2024.
All research outputs
#16,349,841
of 25,815,269 outputs
Outputs from Genome Medicine
#1,423
of 1,618 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#131,777
of 240,906 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Medicine
#20
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,815,269 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,618 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.5. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 240,906 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.