You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Evaluation of partnerships in a transnational family violence prevention network using an integrated knowledge translation and exchange model: a mixed methods study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Health Research Policy and Systems, May 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1478-4505-12-25 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Anita Kothari, Shannon L Sibbald, C Nadine Wathen |
| Abstract |
Family violence is a significant and complex public health problem that demands collaboration between researchers, practitioners, and policymakers for systemic, sustainable solutions. An integrated knowledge translation network was developed to support joint research production and application in the area. The purpose of this study was to determine the extent to which the international Preventing Violence Across the Lifespan (PreVAiL) Research Network built effective partnerships among its members, with a focus on the knowledge user partner perspective. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 2 | 40% |
| Australia | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 2 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 60% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 20% |
| Scientists | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 141 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Peru | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 140 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 29 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 28 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 17 | 12% |
| Librarian | 8 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 26 | 18% |
| Unknown | 26 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 26 | 18% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 25 | 18% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 24 | 17% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 3% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 23 | 16% |
| Unknown | 35 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 December 2015.
All research outputs
#13,456,757
of 23,798,792 outputs
Outputs from Health Research Policy and Systems
#945
of 1,248 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#107,187
of 227,826 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health Research Policy and Systems
#13
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,798,792 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,248 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.1. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 227,826 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.