↓ Skip to main content

A genetically anchored physical framework for Theobroma cacao cv. Matina 1-6

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Genomics, August 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
59 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A genetically anchored physical framework for Theobroma cacao cv. Matina 1-6
Published in
BMC Genomics, August 2011
DOI 10.1186/1471-2164-12-413
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christopher A Saski, Frank A Feltus, Margaret E Staton, Barbara P Blackmon, Stephen P Ficklin, David N Kuhn, Raymond J Schnell, Howard Shapiro, Juan Carlos Motamayor

Abstract

The fermented dried seeds of Theobroma cacao (cacao tree) are the main ingredient in chocolate. World cocoa production was estimated to be 3 million tons in 2010 with an annual estimated average growth rate of 2.2%. The cacao bean production industry is currently under threat from a rise in fungal diseases including black pod, frosty pod, and witches' broom. In order to address these issues, genome-sequencing efforts have been initiated recently to facilitate identification of genetic markers and genes that could be utilized to accelerate the release of robust T. cacao cultivars. However, problems inherent with assembly and resolution of distal regions of complex eukaryotic genomes, such as gaps, chimeric joins, and unresolvable repeat-induced compressions, have been unavoidably encountered with the sequencing strategies selected.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Cuba 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Unknown 57 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 22%
Student > Master 6 10%
Student > Bachelor 6 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 8%
Other 11 19%
Unknown 13 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 30 51%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 3%
Unspecified 1 2%
Environmental Science 1 2%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 13 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 August 2011.
All research outputs
#15,233,109
of 22,649,029 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomics
#6,657
of 10,605 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#74,761
of 106,705 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomics
#41
of 74 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,649,029 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,605 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 106,705 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 74 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.