You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Modifiable cardiovascular disease risk factors as predictors of dementia death: pooling of ten general population-based cohort studies
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Negative Results in BioMedicine, May 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1477-5751-13-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
G David Batty, Tom C Russ, John M Starr, Emmanuel Stamatakis, Mika Kivimäki |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 1 | 25% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 72 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 12 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 17 | 23% |
| Unknown | 13 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 25 | 34% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 8% |
| Psychology | 5 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 8 | 11% |
| Unknown | 20 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 January 2015.
All research outputs
#14,988,646
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Negative Results in BioMedicine
#53
of 116 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#118,923
of 244,022 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Negative Results in BioMedicine
#2
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 116 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 244,022 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.