↓ Skip to main content

Towards a data sharing Code of Conduct for international genomic research

Overview of attention for article published in Genome Medicine, July 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
95 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
129 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Towards a data sharing Code of Conduct for international genomic research
Published in
Genome Medicine, July 2011
DOI 10.1186/gm262
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bartha Maria Knoppers, Jennifer R Harris, Anne Marie Tassé, Isabelle Budin-Ljøsne, Jane Kaye, Mylène Deschênes, Ma'n H Zawati

Abstract

Data sharing is increasingly regarded as an ethical and scientific imperative that advances knowledge and thereby respects the contributions of the participants. Because of this and the ever-increasing amount of data access requests currently filed around the world, three groups have decided to develop data sharing principles specific to the context of collaborative international genomics research. These groups are: the international Public Population Project in Genomics (P3G), an international consortium of projects partaking in large-scale genetic epidemiological studies and biobanks; the European Network for Genetic and Genomic Epidemiology (ENGAGE), a research project aiming to translate data from large-scale epidemiological research initiatives into relevant clinical information; and the Centre for Health, Law and Emerging Technologies (HeLEX). We propose seven different principles and a preliminary international data sharing Code of Conduct for ongoing discussion.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 129 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 2 2%
Canada 2 2%
United States 2 2%
Ireland 1 <1%
Iceland 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Unknown 118 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 30 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 16%
Other 11 9%
Student > Master 9 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 5%
Other 29 22%
Unknown 22 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 21 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 16 12%
Computer Science 11 9%
Philosophy 10 8%
Other 22 17%
Unknown 32 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 July 2021.
All research outputs
#3,253,825
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Genome Medicine
#719
of 1,585 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,023
of 128,478 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Medicine
#3
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,585 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 128,478 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.