↓ Skip to main content

Truncated and modified amyloid-beta species

Overview of attention for article published in Alzheimer's Research & Therapy, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
236 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
355 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Truncated and modified amyloid-beta species
Published in
Alzheimer's Research & Therapy, May 2014
DOI 10.1186/alzrt258
Pubmed ID
Authors

Markus P Kummer, Michael T Heneka

Abstract

Alzheimer's disease pathology is closely connected to the processing of the amyloid precursor protein (APP) resulting in the formation of a variety of amyloid-beta (Aβ) peptides. They are found as insoluble aggregates in senile plaques, the histopathological hallmark of the disease. These peptides are also found in soluble, mostly monomeric and dimeric, forms in the interstitial and cerebrospinal fluid. Due to the combination of several enzymatic activities during APP processing, Aβ peptides exist in multiple isoforms possessing different N-termini and C-termini. These peptides include, to a certain extent, part of the juxtamembrane and transmembrane domain of APP. Besides differences in size, post-translational modifications of Aβ - including oxidation, phosphorylation, nitration, racemization, isomerization, pyroglutamylation, and glycosylation - generate a plethora of peptides with different physiological and pathological properties that may modulate disease progression.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 355 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 <1%
Belgium 2 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 347 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 79 22%
Student > Master 54 15%
Student > Bachelor 46 13%
Researcher 40 11%
Other 14 4%
Other 46 13%
Unknown 76 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 79 22%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 58 16%
Neuroscience 58 16%
Chemistry 33 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 17 5%
Other 29 8%
Unknown 81 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 November 2023.
All research outputs
#6,333,243
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Alzheimer's Research & Therapy
#1,210
of 1,465 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,724
of 240,808 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Alzheimer's Research & Therapy
#10
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,465 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.6. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 240,808 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.