You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Establishment of a pancreatic stem cell line from fibroblast-derived induced pluripotent stem cells
|
---|---|
Published in |
BioMedical Engineering OnLine, May 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/1475-925x-13-64 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Takashi Kuise, Hirofumi Noguchi, Hiroshi Tazawa, Takashi Kawai, Masaya Iwamuro, Issei Saitoh, Hitomi Usui Kataoka, Masami Watanabe, Yasufumi Noguchi, Toshiyoshi Fujiwara |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 46 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 10 | 22% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 17% |
Student > Bachelor | 7 | 15% |
Student > Master | 6 | 13% |
Other | 3 | 7% |
Other | 4 | 9% |
Unknown | 8 | 17% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 10 | 22% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 22% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 17% |
Neuroscience | 2 | 4% |
Computer Science | 1 | 2% |
Other | 5 | 11% |
Unknown | 10 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 June 2014.
All research outputs
#4,651,291
of 22,756,196 outputs
Outputs from BioMedical Engineering OnLine
#120
of 822 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,154
of 226,570 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BioMedical Engineering OnLine
#5
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,756,196 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 822 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 226,570 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.