↓ Skip to main content

Individual and work-related risk factors for musculoskeletal pain: a cross-sectional study among Estonian computer users

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
facebook
14 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
78 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
321 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Individual and work-related risk factors for musculoskeletal pain: a cross-sectional study among Estonian computer users
Published in
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, May 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2474-15-181
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kristel Oha, Liina Animägi, Mati Pääsuke, David Coggon, Eda Merisalu

Abstract

Occupational use of computers has increased rapidly over recent decades, and has been linked with various musculoskeletal disorders, which are now the most commonly diagnosed occupational diseases in Estonia. The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence of musculoskeletal pain (MSP) by anatomical region during the past 12 months and to investigate its association with personal characteristics and work-related risk factors among Estonian office workers using computers.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 321 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Malaysia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Estonia 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Unknown 317 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 54 17%
Student > Bachelor 46 14%
Student > Postgraduate 21 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 6%
Researcher 19 6%
Other 56 17%
Unknown 105 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 61 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 50 16%
Engineering 24 7%
Psychology 13 4%
Social Sciences 11 3%
Other 48 15%
Unknown 114 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 August 2014.
All research outputs
#3,873,500
of 22,756,196 outputs
Outputs from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#748
of 4,037 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,652
of 226,672 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#14
of 102 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,756,196 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,037 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 226,672 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 102 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.