↓ Skip to main content

Deep short-read sequencing of chromosome 17 from the mouse strains A/J and CAST/Ei identifies significant germline variation and candidate genes that regulate liver triglyceride levels

Overview of attention for article published in Genome Biology, October 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
67 Mendeley
connotea
4 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Deep short-read sequencing of chromosome 17 from the mouse strains A/J and CAST/Ei identifies significant germline variation and candidate genes that regulate liver triglyceride levels
Published in
Genome Biology, October 2009
DOI 10.1186/gb-2009-10-10-r112
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ian Sudbery, Jim Stalker, Jared T Simpson, Thomas Keane, Alistair G Rust, Matthew E Hurles, Klaudia Walter, Dee Lynch, Lydia Teboul, Steve D Brown, Heng Li, Zemin Ning, Joseph H Nadeau, Colleen M Croniger, Richard Durbin, David J Adams

Abstract

Genome sequences are essential tools for comparative and mutational analyses. Here we present the short read sequence of mouse chromosome 17 from the Mus musculus domesticus derived strain A/J, and the Mus musculus castaneus derived strain CAST/Ei. We describe approaches for the accurate identification of nucleotide and structural variation in the genomes of vertebrate experimental organisms, and show how these techniques can be applied to help prioritize candidate genes within quantitative trait loci.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 7%
France 2 3%
Netherlands 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
China 1 1%
Unknown 55 82%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 23 34%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 21%
Professor 5 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 7%
Other 4 6%
Other 11 16%
Unknown 5 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 46 69%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 12%
Mathematics 2 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 3%
Computer Science 2 3%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 5 7%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 March 2011.
All research outputs
#5,423,170
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Genome Biology
#2,923
of 4,467 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,806
of 105,837 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Biology
#14
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,467 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.6. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 105,837 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.