↓ Skip to main content

Integrating forest inventory and analysis data into a LIDAR-based carbon monitoring system

Overview of attention for article published in Carbon Balance and Management, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 tweeters
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
78 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Integrating forest inventory and analysis data into a LIDAR-based carbon monitoring system
Published in
Carbon Balance and Management, May 2014
DOI 10.1186/1750-0680-9-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kristofer D Johnson, Richard Birdsey, Andrew O Finley, Anu Swantaran, Ralph Dubayah, Craig Wayson, Rachel Riemann

Abstract

Forest Inventory and Analysis (FIA) data may be a valuable component of a LIDAR-based carbon monitoring system, but integration of the two observation systems is not without challenges. To explore integration methods, two wall-to-wall LIDAR-derived biomass maps were compared to FIA data at both the plot and county levels in Anne Arundel and Howard Counties in Maryland. Allometric model-related errors were also considered.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 3%
Thailand 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 72 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 22 28%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 23%
Student > Master 11 14%
Other 5 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 6%
Other 12 15%
Unknown 5 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 27 35%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 17 22%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 14%
Social Sciences 5 6%
Engineering 2 3%
Other 4 5%
Unknown 12 15%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 May 2014.
All research outputs
#3,260,230
of 14,336,412 outputs
Outputs from Carbon Balance and Management
#56
of 166 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,450
of 189,675 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Carbon Balance and Management
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,336,412 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 77th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 166 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 189,675 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them