↓ Skip to main content

Dehydration stress memory genes of Zea mays; comparison with Arabidopsis thaliana

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Plant Biology, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (51st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
weibo
1 weibo user

Citations

dimensions_citation
99 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
122 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Dehydration stress memory genes of Zea mays; comparison with Arabidopsis thaliana
Published in
BMC Plant Biology, May 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2229-14-141
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yong Ding, Laetitia Virlouvet, Ning Liu, Jean-Jack Riethoven, Michael Fromm, Zoya Avramova

Abstract

Pre-exposing plants to diverse abiotic stresses may alter their physiological and transcriptional responses to a subsequent stress, suggesting a form of "stress memory". Arabidopsis thaliana plants that have experienced multiple exposures to dehydration stress display transcriptional behavior suggesting "memory" from an earlier stress. Genes that respond to a first stress by up-regulating or down-regulating their transcription but in a subsequent stress provide a significantly different response define the 'memory genes' category. Genes responding similarly to each stress form the 'non-memory' category. It is unknown whether such memory responses exists in other Angiosperm lineages and whether memory is an evolutionarily conserved response to repeated dehydration stresses.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 122 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Chile 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Unknown 119 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 19%
Researcher 21 17%
Student > Master 18 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 10%
Student > Bachelor 10 8%
Other 14 11%
Unknown 24 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 63 52%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 20 16%
Environmental Science 2 2%
Unspecified 2 2%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 2%
Other 4 3%
Unknown 29 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 January 2015.
All research outputs
#13,176,295
of 22,756,196 outputs
Outputs from BMC Plant Biology
#916
of 3,234 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#108,051
of 226,264 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Plant Biology
#14
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,756,196 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,234 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 226,264 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.