You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Quantitative analysis of lung elastic fibers in idiopathic pleuroparenchymal fibroelastosis (IPPFE): comparison of clinical, radiological, and pathological findings with those of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF)
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Pulmonary Medicine, May 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2466-14-91 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Noriyuki Enomoto, Hideki Kusagaya, Yoshiyuki Oyama, Masato Kono, Yusuke Kaida, Shigeki Kuroishi, Dai Hashimoto, Tomoyuki Fujisawa, Koshi Yokomura, Naoki Inui, Yutaro Nakamura, Takafumi Suda |
Abstract |
The pathological appearance of idiopathic pleuroparenchymal fibroelastosis (IPPFE) with hematoxylin-eosin staining is similar to that of usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). The amount of elastic fibers (EF) and detailed differences between IPPFE and IPF have not been fully elucidated. The aim of this study was to quantify the EF and identify the differences between IPPFE and IPF. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Netherlands | 1 | 50% |
Israel | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 38 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Other | 9 | 24% |
Researcher | 5 | 13% |
Student > Master | 4 | 11% |
Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 8% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 8% |
Other | 7 | 18% |
Unknown | 7 | 18% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 25 | 66% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 5% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 3% |
Neuroscience | 1 | 3% |
Engineering | 1 | 3% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 8 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 May 2014.
All research outputs
#14,196,440
of 22,756,196 outputs
Outputs from BMC Pulmonary Medicine
#844
of 1,903 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#119,242
of 226,672 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Pulmonary Medicine
#14
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,756,196 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,903 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 226,672 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.