You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Sex differences in outcomes of methadone maintenance treatment for opioid addiction: a systematic review protocol
|
---|---|
Published in |
Systematic Reviews, May 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/2046-4053-3-45 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Monica Bawor, Brittany B Dennis, Rebecca Anglin, Meir Steiner, Lehana Thabane, Zainab Samaan |
Abstract |
Use of methadone for the treatment of opioid addiction is an effective harm-reduction approach, although variability in treatment outcomes among individuals has been reported. Men and women with opioid addiction have been known to differ in factors such as opioid use patterns and characteristics at treatment entry; however, little has been reported about differences in methadone treatment outcomes between men and women. Therefore, we present a protocol for a systematic review which aims to provide a summary of existing literature on sex differences in outcomes of methadone treatment for opioid addiction. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 87 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Finland | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 86 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 17 | 20% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 15% |
Researcher | 12 | 14% |
Student > Bachelor | 12 | 14% |
Other | 4 | 5% |
Other | 12 | 14% |
Unknown | 17 | 20% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 26 | 30% |
Psychology | 11 | 13% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 10% |
Social Sciences | 8 | 9% |
Neuroscience | 5 | 6% |
Other | 8 | 9% |
Unknown | 20 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 July 2023.
All research outputs
#6,742,573
of 24,056,502 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#1,230
of 2,092 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#61,762
of 231,111 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#14
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,056,502 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,092 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.0. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 231,111 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.