↓ Skip to main content

Neonatal survival in complex humanitarian emergencies: setting an evidence-based research agenda

Overview of attention for article published in Conflict and Health, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
6 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
81 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Neonatal survival in complex humanitarian emergencies: setting an evidence-based research agenda
Published in
Conflict and Health, May 2014
DOI 10.1186/1752-1505-8-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Diane F Morof, Kate Kerber, Barbara Tomczyk, Joy Lawn, Curtis Blanton, Samira Sami, Ribka Amsalu

Abstract

Over 40% of all deaths among children under 5 are neonatal deaths (0-28 days), and this proportion is increasing. In 2012, 2.9 million newborns died, with 99% occurring in low- and middle-income countries. Many of the countries with the highest neonatal mortality rates globally are currently or have recently been affected by complex humanitarian emergencies. Despite the global burden of neonatal morbidity and mortality and risks inherent in complex emergency situations, research investments are not commensurate to burden and little is known about the epidemiology or best practices for neonatal survival in these settings.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Unknown 80 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 17 21%
Researcher 16 20%
Other 9 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 7%
Other 12 15%
Unknown 13 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 27 33%
Social Sciences 14 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 2%
Other 6 7%
Unknown 16 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 May 2020.
All research outputs
#2,086,746
of 17,595,144 outputs
Outputs from Conflict and Health
#220
of 449 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,924
of 197,172 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conflict and Health
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,595,144 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 449 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 197,172 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them