↓ Skip to main content

Reactivity to fearful expressions of familiar and unfamiliar people in children with autism: an eye-tracking pupillometry study

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Neurodevelopmental Disorders, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
59 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
175 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Reactivity to fearful expressions of familiar and unfamiliar people in children with autism: an eye-tracking pupillometry study
Published in
Journal of Neurodevelopmental Disorders, May 2014
DOI 10.1186/1866-1955-6-14
Pubmed ID
Authors

Heather J Nuske, Giacomo Vivanti, Cheryl Dissanayake

Abstract

Individuals with autism are often reported to have difficulty with emotion processing. However, clinical and experimental data show that they are sensitive to familiarity; for example, they show normative attachment to familiar people, and have normative brain activity in response to familiar faces. To date, no study has measured their reactivity to the emotions of familiar vs. unfamiliar people. Thus, our aim was to determine whether individuals with autism would show normative reactivity to emotion in familiar people.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 175 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Turkey 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
Unknown 170 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 16%
Student > Bachelor 24 14%
Researcher 19 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 18 10%
Student > Master 17 10%
Other 27 15%
Unknown 42 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 67 38%
Neuroscience 14 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 6%
Computer Science 8 5%
Social Sciences 6 3%
Other 22 13%
Unknown 48 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 July 2020.
All research outputs
#2,785,911
of 25,654,806 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neurodevelopmental Disorders
#104
of 514 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,849
of 241,526 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neurodevelopmental Disorders
#2
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,654,806 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 514 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 241,526 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.