↓ Skip to main content

International consensus on (ICON) anaphylaxis

Overview of attention for article published in World Allergy Organization Journal, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#43 of 891)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
37 X users
facebook
5 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
383 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
364 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
International consensus on (ICON) anaphylaxis
Published in
World Allergy Organization Journal, May 2014
DOI 10.1186/1939-4551-7-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

F Estelle R Simons, Ledit RF Ardusso, M Beatrice Bilò, Victoria Cardona, Motohiro Ebisawa, Yehia M El-Gamal, Phil Lieberman, Richard F Lockey, Antonella Muraro, Graham Roberts, Mario Sanchez-Borges, Aziz Sheikh, Lynette P Shek, Dana V Wallace, Margitta Worm

Abstract

ICON: Anaphylaxis provides a unique perspective on the principal evidence-based anaphylaxis guidelines developed and published independently from 2010 through 2014 by four allergy/immunology organizations. These guidelines concur with regard to the clinical features that indicate a likely diagnosis of anaphylaxis -- a life-threatening generalized or systemic allergic or hypersensitivity reaction. They also concur about prompt initial treatment with intramuscular injection of epinephrine (adrenaline) in the mid-outer thigh, positioning the patient supine (semi-reclining if dyspneic or vomiting), calling for help, and when indicated, providing supplemental oxygen, intravenous fluid resuscitation and cardiopulmonary resuscitation, along with concomitant monitoring of vital signs and oxygenation. Additionally, they concur that H1-antihistamines, H2-antihistamines, and glucocorticoids are not initial medications of choice. For self-management of patients at risk of anaphylaxis in community settings, they recommend carrying epinephrine auto-injectors and personalized emergency action plans, as well as follow-up with a physician (ideally an allergy/immunology specialist) to help prevent anaphylaxis recurrences. ICON: Anaphylaxis describes unmet needs in anaphylaxis, noting that although epinephrine in 1 mg/mL ampules is available worldwide, other essentials, including supplemental oxygen, intravenous fluid resuscitation, and epinephrine auto-injectors are not universally available. ICON: Anaphylaxis proposes a comprehensive international research agenda that calls for additional prospective studies of anaphylaxis epidemiology, patient risk factors and co-factors, triggers, clinical criteria for diagnosis, randomized controlled trials of therapeutic interventions, and measures to prevent anaphylaxis recurrences. It also calls for facilitation of global collaborations in anaphylaxis research. IN ADDITION TO CONFIRMING THE ALIGNMENT OF MAJOR ANAPHYLAXIS GUIDELINES, ICON: Anaphylaxis adds value by including summary tables and citing 130 key references. It is published as an information resource about anaphylaxis for worldwide use by healthcare professionals, academics, policy-makers, patients, caregivers, and the public.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 37 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 364 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Mexico 2 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Unknown 355 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 48 13%
Student > Master 37 10%
Student > Bachelor 36 10%
Other 35 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 31 9%
Other 97 27%
Unknown 80 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 169 46%
Nursing and Health Professions 22 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 15 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 9 2%
Other 41 11%
Unknown 93 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 34. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 October 2022.
All research outputs
#1,189,146
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from World Allergy Organization Journal
#43
of 891 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,377
of 240,672 outputs
Outputs of similar age from World Allergy Organization Journal
#3
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 891 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 240,672 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.