↓ Skip to main content

What do we know about how to do audit and feedback? Pitfalls in applying evidence from a systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Health Services Research, July 2005
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
192 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
258 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
What do we know about how to do audit and feedback? Pitfalls in applying evidence from a systematic review
Published in
BMC Health Services Research, July 2005
DOI 10.1186/1472-6963-5-50
Pubmed ID
Authors

R Foy, MP Eccles, G Jamtvedt, J Young, JM Grimshaw, R Baker

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 258 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 5 2%
United States 2 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Nigeria 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Unknown 246 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 46 18%
Researcher 39 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 36 14%
Other 25 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 17 7%
Other 59 23%
Unknown 36 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 89 34%
Nursing and Health Professions 26 10%
Social Sciences 21 8%
Business, Management and Accounting 17 7%
Psychology 15 6%
Other 38 15%
Unknown 52 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 September 2021.
All research outputs
#7,537,497
of 22,997,544 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#3,758
of 7,702 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,517
of 57,916 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,997,544 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,702 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 57,916 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.