↓ Skip to main content

Postsynaptic Potentiation of Corticospinal Projecting Neurons in the Anterior Cingulate Cortex after Nerve Injury

Overview of attention for article published in Molecular Pain, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
79 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Postsynaptic Potentiation of Corticospinal Projecting Neurons in the Anterior Cingulate Cortex after Nerve Injury
Published in
Molecular Pain, January 2014
DOI 10.1186/1744-8069-10-33
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tao Chen, Kohei Koga, Giannina Descalzi, Shuang Qiu, Jian Wang, Le-Shi Zhang, Zhi-Jian Zhang, Xiao-Bin He, Xin Qin, Fu-Qiang Xu, Ji Hu, Feng Wei, Richard L Huganir, Yun-Qing Li, Min Zhuo

Abstract

Long-term potentiation (LTP) is the key cellular mechanism for physiological learning and pathological chronic pain. In the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), postsynaptic recruitment or modification of AMPA receptor (AMPAR) GluA1 contribute to the expression of LTP. Here we report that pyramidal cells in the deep layers of the ACC send direct descending projecting terminals to the dorsal horn of the spinal cord (lamina I-III). After peripheral nerve injury, these projection cells are activated, and postsynaptic excitatory responses of these descending projecting neurons were significantly enhanced. Newly recruited AMPARs contribute to the potentiated synaptic transmission of cingulate neurons. PKA-dependent phosphorylation of GluA1 is important, since enhanced synaptic transmission was abolished in GluA1 phosphorylation site serine-845 mutant mice. Our findings provide strong evidence that peripheral nerve injury induce long-term enhancement of cortical-spinal projecting cells in the ACC. Direct top-down projection system provides rapid and profound modulation of spinal sensory transmission, including painful information. Inhibiting cortical top-down descending facilitation may serve as a novel target for treating neuropathic pain.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Hong Kong 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 77 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 23%
Researcher 10 13%
Student > Bachelor 7 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 8%
Other 16 20%
Unknown 15 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 28 35%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 11%
Psychology 5 6%
Engineering 2 3%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 18 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 June 2014.
All research outputs
#22,759,452
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Molecular Pain
#595
of 669 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#280,470
of 319,281 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Molecular Pain
#51
of 58 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 669 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 319,281 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 58 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.