You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Gait training early after stroke with a new exoskeleton – the hybrid assistive limb: a study of safety and feasibility
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, June 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1743-0003-11-92 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Anneli Nilsson, Katarina Skough Vreede, Vera Häglund, Hiroaki Kawamoto, Yoshiyuki Sankai, Jörgen Borg |
| Abstract |
Intensive task specific training early after stroke may enhance beneficial neuroplasticity and functional recovery. Impaired gait after hemiparetic stroke remains a challenge that may be approached early after stroke by use of novel technology. The aim of the study was to investigate the safety and feasibility of the exoskeleton Hybrid Assistive Limb (HAL) for intensive gait training as part of a regular inpatient rehabilitation program for hemiparetic patients with severely impaired gait early after stroke. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 350 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Czechia | 1 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 341 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 60 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 58 | 17% |
| Researcher | 44 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 38 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 17 | 5% |
| Other | 51 | 15% |
| Unknown | 82 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 99 | 28% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 44 | 13% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 39 | 11% |
| Neuroscience | 22 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 3% |
| Other | 40 | 11% |
| Unknown | 95 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 September 2014.
All research outputs
#15,168,964
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
#731
of 1,413 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#122,158
of 241,454 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
#16
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,413 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 241,454 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.