You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The associations between objectively-determined and self-reported urban form characteristics and neighborhood-based walking in adults
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, June 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1479-5868-11-71 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Elizabeth Jack, Gavin R McCormack |
| Abstract |
Self-reported and objectively-determined neighborhood built characteristics are associated with physical activity, yet little is known about their combined influence on walking. This study: 1) compared self-reported measures of the neighborhood built environment between objectively-determined low, medium, and high walkable neighborhoods; 2) estimated the relative associations between self-reported and objectively-determined neighborhood characteristics and walking and; 3) examined the extent to which the objectively-determined built environment moderates the association between self-reported measures of the neighborhood built environment and walking. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 5 | 56% |
| United States | 2 | 22% |
| Unknown | 2 | 22% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 4 | 44% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 33% |
| Members of the public | 2 | 22% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 209 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 201 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 36 | 17% |
| Researcher | 33 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 29 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 19 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 6% |
| Other | 40 | 19% |
| Unknown | 39 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 48 | 23% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 29 | 14% |
| Environmental Science | 14 | 7% |
| Sports and Recreations | 10 | 5% |
| Psychology | 9 | 4% |
| Other | 45 | 22% |
| Unknown | 54 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 September 2016.
All research outputs
#6,875,065
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
#1,535
of 2,116 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#61,171
of 242,195 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
#26
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,116 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.5. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,195 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.