You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
SolRgene: an online database to explore disease resistance genes in tuber-bearing Solanumspecies
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Plant Biology, August 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2229-11-116 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Vivianne GAA Vleeshouwers, Richard Finkers, Dirk Budding, Marcel Visser, Mirjam MJ Jacobs, Ralph van Berloo, Mathieu Pel, Nicolas Champouret, Erin Bakker, Pavel Krenek, Hendrik Rietman, DirkJan Huigen, Roel Hoekstra, Aska Goverse, Ben Vosman, Evert Jacobsen, Richard GF Visser |
| Abstract |
The cultivated potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) is an important food crop, but highly susceptible to many pathogens. The major threat to potato production is the Irish famine pathogen Phytophthora infestans, which causes the devastating late blight disease. Potato breeding makes use of germplasm from wild relatives (wild germplasm) to introduce resistances into cultivated potato. The Solanum section Petota comprises tuber-bearing species that are potential donors of new disease resistance genes. The aim of this study was to explore Solanum section Petota for resistance genes and generate a widely accessible resource that is useful for studying and implementing disease resistance in potato. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Belgium | 1 | 25% |
| India | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 2 | 50% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 25% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 75 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 26 | 34% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 23% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 12% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 5 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 6 | 8% |
| Unknown | 10 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 49 | 64% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 9% |
| Chemistry | 4 | 5% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 15 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 September 2011.
All research outputs
#14,599,900
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from BMC Plant Biology
#959
of 3,588 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#84,750
of 133,396 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Plant Biology
#8
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,588 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 133,396 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.