You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Choice of bacterial DNA extraction method from fecal material influences community structure as evaluated by metagenomic analysis
|
---|---|
Published in |
Microbiome, June 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/2049-2618-2-19 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Agata Wesolowska-Andersen, Martin Iain Bahl, Vera Carvalho, Karsten Kristiansen, Thomas Sicheritz-Pontén, Ramneek Gupta, Tine Rask Licht |
Abstract |
In recent years, studies on the human intestinal microbiota have attracted tremendous attention. Application of next generation sequencing for mapping of bacterial phylogeny and function has opened new doors to this field of research. However, little attention has been given to the effects of choice of methodology on the output resulting from such studies. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 31 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 10 | 32% |
United Kingdom | 4 | 13% |
Australia | 2 | 6% |
Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 3% |
China | 1 | 3% |
Netherlands | 1 | 3% |
Korea, Republic of | 1 | 3% |
Germany | 1 | 3% |
Italy | 1 | 3% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 9 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 19 | 61% |
Members of the public | 11 | 35% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 542 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 7 | 1% |
Denmark | 3 | <1% |
United Kingdom | 3 | <1% |
France | 2 | <1% |
Netherlands | 2 | <1% |
Germany | 2 | <1% |
Belgium | 2 | <1% |
Canada | 1 | <1% |
New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
Other | 4 | <1% |
Unknown | 515 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 128 | 24% |
Researcher | 119 | 22% |
Student > Master | 79 | 15% |
Student > Bachelor | 42 | 8% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 31 | 6% |
Other | 72 | 13% |
Unknown | 71 | 13% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 212 | 39% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 107 | 20% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 55 | 10% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 24 | 4% |
Environmental Science | 12 | 2% |
Other | 44 | 8% |
Unknown | 88 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 31. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 November 2023.
All research outputs
#1,260,842
of 25,368,786 outputs
Outputs from Microbiome
#408
of 1,756 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,165
of 242,147 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Microbiome
#2
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,368,786 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,756 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,147 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.