↓ Skip to main content

Choice of bacterial DNA extraction method from fecal material influences community structure as evaluated by metagenomic analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Microbiome, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
31 X users
patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
222 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
542 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Choice of bacterial DNA extraction method from fecal material influences community structure as evaluated by metagenomic analysis
Published in
Microbiome, June 2014
DOI 10.1186/2049-2618-2-19
Pubmed ID
Authors

Agata Wesolowska-Andersen, Martin Iain Bahl, Vera Carvalho, Karsten Kristiansen, Thomas Sicheritz-Pontén, Ramneek Gupta, Tine Rask Licht

Abstract

In recent years, studies on the human intestinal microbiota have attracted tremendous attention. Application of next generation sequencing for mapping of bacterial phylogeny and function has opened new doors to this field of research. However, little attention has been given to the effects of choice of methodology on the output resulting from such studies.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 31 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 542 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 7 1%
Denmark 3 <1%
United Kingdom 3 <1%
France 2 <1%
Netherlands 2 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
Belgium 2 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Other 4 <1%
Unknown 515 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 128 24%
Researcher 119 22%
Student > Master 79 15%
Student > Bachelor 42 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 31 6%
Other 72 13%
Unknown 71 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 212 39%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 107 20%
Immunology and Microbiology 55 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 24 4%
Environmental Science 12 2%
Other 44 8%
Unknown 88 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 31. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 November 2023.
All research outputs
#1,260,842
of 25,368,786 outputs
Outputs from Microbiome
#408
of 1,756 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,165
of 242,147 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Microbiome
#2
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,368,786 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,756 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,147 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.