↓ Skip to main content

Dual application of duckweed and azolla plants for wastewater treatment and renewable fuels and petrochemicals production

Overview of attention for article published in Biotechnology for Biofuels and Bioproducts, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
5 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
97 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
217 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Dual application of duckweed and azolla plants for wastewater treatment and renewable fuels and petrochemicals production
Published in
Biotechnology for Biofuels and Bioproducts, February 2014
DOI 10.1186/1754-6834-7-30
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nazim Muradov, Mohamed Taha, Ana F Miranda, Krishna Kadali, Amit Gujar, Simone Rochfort, Trevor Stevenson, Andrew S Ball, Aidyn Mouradov

Abstract

Shortages in fresh water supplies today affects more than 1 billion people worldwide. Phytoremediation strategies, based on the abilities of aquatic plants to recycle nutrients offer an attractive solution for the bioremediation of water pollution and represents one of the most globally researched issues. The subsequent application of the biomass from the remediation for the production of fuels and petrochemicals offers an ecologically friendly and cost-effective solution for water pollution problems and production of value-added products.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 217 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Indonesia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 213 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 36 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 14%
Student > Bachelor 28 13%
Researcher 26 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 6%
Other 30 14%
Unknown 54 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 49 23%
Environmental Science 26 12%
Engineering 25 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 6%
Chemistry 11 5%
Other 31 14%
Unknown 62 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 June 2015.
All research outputs
#2,996,101
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Biotechnology for Biofuels and Bioproducts
#137
of 1,578 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,162
of 235,662 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biotechnology for Biofuels and Bioproducts
#6
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,578 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 235,662 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.