↓ Skip to main content

Increased level of acute phase reactants in patients infected with modern Mycobacterium tuberculosis genotypes in Mwanza, Tanzania

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Infectious Diseases, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
68 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Increased level of acute phase reactants in patients infected with modern Mycobacterium tuberculosis genotypes in Mwanza, Tanzania
Published in
BMC Infectious Diseases, June 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2334-14-309
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ruth Stavrum, George PrayGod, Nyagosya Range, Daniel Faurholt-Jepsen, Kidola Jeremiah, Maria Faurholt-Jepsen, Henrik Krarup, Martine G Aabye, John Changalucha, Henrik Friis, Aase B Andersen, Harleen MS Grewal

Abstract

There is increasing evidence to suggest that different Mycobacterium tuberculosis lineages cause variations in the clinical presentation of tuberculosis (TB). Certain M. tuberculosis genotypes/lineages have been shown to be more likely to cause active TB in human populations from a distinct genetic ancestry. This study describes the genetic biodiversity of M. tuberculosis genotypes in Mwanza city, Tanzania and the clinical presentation of the disease caused by isolates of different lineages.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 68 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 19 28%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 16%
Student > Master 10 15%
Other 5 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 4%
Other 7 10%
Unknown 13 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 28%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 10%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 3%
Other 11 16%
Unknown 17 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 June 2014.
All research outputs
#14,638,545
of 23,881,329 outputs
Outputs from BMC Infectious Diseases
#3,716
of 7,931 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#119,492
of 230,535 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Infectious Diseases
#86
of 169 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,881,329 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,931 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 230,535 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 169 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.