↓ Skip to main content

Efficacy of sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine for intermittent preventive treatment of malaria in pregnancy, Mansa, Zambia

Overview of attention for article published in Malaria Journal, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
155 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Efficacy of sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine for intermittent preventive treatment of malaria in pregnancy, Mansa, Zambia
Published in
Malaria Journal, June 2014
DOI 10.1186/1475-2875-13-227
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kathrine R Tan, Bonnie L Katalenich, Kimberly E Mace, Michael Nambozi, Steve M Taylor, Steven R Meshnick, Ryan E Wiegand, Victor Chalwe, Scott J Filler, Mulakwa Kamuliwo, Allen S Craig

Abstract

Intermittent preventive treatment of malaria in pregnancy (IPTp) with sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP) decreases adverse effects of malaria during pregnancy. Zambia implemented its IPTp-SP programme in 2003. Emergence of SP-resistant Plasmodium falciparum threatens this strategy. The quintuple mutant haplotype (substitutions in N51I, C59R, S108N in dhfr and A437G and K540E in dhps genes), is associated with SP treatment failure in non-pregnant patients with malaria. This study examined efficacy of IPTp-SP and presence of the quintuple mutant among pregnant women in Mansa, Zambia.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 155 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 154 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 41 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 11%
Researcher 16 10%
Student > Bachelor 15 10%
Student > Postgraduate 10 6%
Other 26 17%
Unknown 30 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 44 28%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 15 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 11 7%
Other 21 14%
Unknown 35 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 September 2016.
All research outputs
#6,779,892
of 24,400,706 outputs
Outputs from Malaria Journal
#1,844
of 5,827 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#61,158
of 233,433 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Malaria Journal
#31
of 99 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,400,706 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,827 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 233,433 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 99 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.