↓ Skip to main content

Medication errors related to transdermal opioid patches: lessons from a regional incident reporting system

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Pharmacology and Toxicology, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
39 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Medication errors related to transdermal opioid patches: lessons from a regional incident reporting system
Published in
BMC Pharmacology and Toxicology, June 2014
DOI 10.1186/2050-6511-15-31
Pubmed ID
Authors

Henrik Lövborg, Mikael Holmlund, Staffan Hägg

Abstract

A few cases of adverse reactions linked to erroneous use of transdermal opioid patches have been reported in the literature. The aim of this study was to describe and characterize medication errors (MEs) associated with use of transdermal fentanyl and buprenorphine.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Finland 1 3%
Unknown 38 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 15%
Student > Master 6 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 13%
Researcher 4 10%
Student > Postgraduate 4 10%
Other 9 23%
Unknown 5 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 38%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 8%
Computer Science 3 8%
Social Sciences 2 5%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 9 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 June 2014.
All research outputs
#16,745,862
of 24,631,014 outputs
Outputs from BMC Pharmacology and Toxicology
#259
of 467 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#138,607
of 233,857 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Pharmacology and Toxicology
#9
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,631,014 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 467 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 233,857 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.