↓ Skip to main content

Extracorporeal lung support in trauma patients with severe chest injury and acute lung failure: a 10-year institutional experience

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
144 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
115 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Extracorporeal lung support in trauma patients with severe chest injury and acute lung failure: a 10-year institutional experience
Published in
Critical Care, June 2013
DOI 10.1186/cc12782
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michael Ried, Thomas Bein, Alois Philipp, Thomas Müller, Bernhard Graf, Christof Schmid, David Zonies, Claudius Diez, Hans Stefan Hofmann

Abstract

Severe trauma with concomitant chest injury is frequently associated with acute lung failure (ALF). This report summarizes our experience with extracorporeal lung support (ELS) in thoracic trauma patients treated at the University Medical Center Regensburg.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 115 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 2%
Germany 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Romania 1 <1%
Greece 1 <1%
Unknown 109 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 19 17%
Student > Master 13 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 10%
Other 11 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 9%
Other 27 23%
Unknown 23 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 69 60%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 3%
Engineering 2 2%
Materials Science 2 2%
Other 6 5%
Unknown 26 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 June 2014.
All research outputs
#7,778,510
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#4,172
of 6,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#63,108
of 209,228 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#42
of 112 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 209,228 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 112 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.