↓ Skip to main content

Better recognition, diagnosis and management of non‐IgE‐mediated cow's milk allergy in infancy: iMAP—an international interpretation of the MAP (Milk Allergy in Primary Care) guideline

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical and Translational Allergy, August 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#8 of 765)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
policy
1 policy source
twitter
110 X users
facebook
9 Facebook pages
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
3 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
120 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
217 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Better recognition, diagnosis and management of non‐IgE‐mediated cow's milk allergy in infancy: iMAP—an international interpretation of the MAP (Milk Allergy in Primary Care) guideline
Published in
Clinical and Translational Allergy, August 2017
DOI 10.1186/s13601-017-0162-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Carina Venter, Trevor Brown, Rosan Meyer, Joanne Walsh, Neil Shah, Anna Nowak-Węgrzyn, Tong-Xin Chen, David M. Fleischer, Ralf G. Heine, Michael Levin, Mario C. Vieira, Adam T. Fox

Abstract

Cow's milk allergy (CMA) is one of the most common presentations of food allergy seen in early childhood. It is also one of the most complex food allergies, being implicated in IgE-mediated food allergy as well as diverse manifestations of non-IgE-mediated food allergy. For example, gastrointestinal CMA may present as food protein induced enteropathy, enterocolitis or proctocolitis. Concerns regarding the early and timely diagnosis of CMA have been highlighted over the years. In response to these, guideline papers from the United Kingdom (UK), Australia, Europe, the Americas and the World Allergy Organisation have been published. The UK guideline, 'Diagnosis and management of non-IgE-mediated cow's milk allergy in infancy-a UK primary care practical guide' was published in this journal in 2013. This Milk Allergy in Primary Care (MAP) guideline outlines in simple algorithmic form, both the varying presentations of cow's milk allergy and also focuses on the practical management of the most common presentation, namely mild-to-moderate non-IgE-mediated allergy. Based on the international uptake of the MAP guideline, it became clear that there was a need for practical guidance beyond the UK. Consequently, this paper presents an international interpretation of the MAP guideline to help practitioners in primary care settings around the world. It incorporates further published UK guidance, feedback from UK healthcare professionals and affected families and, importantly, also international guidance and expertise.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 110 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 217 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 217 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 32 15%
Researcher 23 11%
Student > Postgraduate 17 8%
Student > Bachelor 17 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 7%
Other 44 20%
Unknown 68 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 80 37%
Nursing and Health Professions 20 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 2%
Other 14 6%
Unknown 76 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 121. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 January 2023.
All research outputs
#349,730
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Clinical and Translational Allergy
#8
of 765 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,386
of 326,963 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical and Translational Allergy
#1
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 765 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,963 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.