↓ Skip to main content

How funding agencies can support research use in healthcare: an online province-wide survey to determine knowledge translation training needs

Overview of attention for article published in Implementation Science, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
17 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
64 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
How funding agencies can support research use in healthcare: an online province-wide survey to determine knowledge translation training needs
Published in
Implementation Science, June 2014
DOI 10.1186/1748-5908-9-71
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bev J Holmes, Megan Schellenberg, Kara Schell, Gayle Scarrow

Abstract

Health research funding agencies are increasingly promoting evidence use in health practice and policy. Building on work suggesting how agencies can support such knowledge translation (KT), this paper discusses an online survey to assess KT training needs of researchers and research users as part of a Canadian provincial capacity-building effort.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 2 3%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Unknown 61 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 17 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 13%
Student > Master 7 11%
Librarian 5 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 6%
Other 12 19%
Unknown 11 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 23%
Social Sciences 13 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 8%
Business, Management and Accounting 4 6%
Neuroscience 2 3%
Other 8 13%
Unknown 17 27%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 February 2021.
All research outputs
#1,905,028
of 18,496,698 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#515
of 1,615 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,514
of 200,134 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#3
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,496,698 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,615 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 200,134 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.