You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Local interaction strategies and capacity for better care in nursing homes: a multiple case study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Health Services Research, June 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1472-6963-14-244 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ruth A Anderson, Mark P Toles, Kirsten Corazzini, Reuben R McDaniel, Cathleen Colón-Emeric |
| Abstract |
To describe relationship patterns and management practices in nursing homes (NHs) that facilitate or pose barriers to better outcomes for residents and staff. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 79 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 17 | 22% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 14% |
| Other | 7 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 9% |
| Researcher | 7 | 9% |
| Other | 15 | 19% |
| Unknown | 15 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 19 | 24% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 20% |
| Social Sciences | 12 | 15% |
| Psychology | 4 | 5% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 11 | 14% |
| Unknown | 15 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 July 2014.
All research outputs
#15,301,754
of 22,757,090 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#5,547
of 7,617 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#133,208
of 228,023 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#93
of 138 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,757,090 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,617 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,023 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 138 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.