↓ Skip to main content

Population genetic structure of gray wolves (Canis lupus) in a marine archipelago suggests island-mainland differentiation consistent with dietary niche

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Ecology and Evolution, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
10 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
35 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
43 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
130 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Population genetic structure of gray wolves (Canis lupus) in a marine archipelago suggests island-mainland differentiation consistent with dietary niche
Published in
BMC Ecology and Evolution, June 2014
DOI 10.1186/1472-6785-14-11
Pubmed ID
Authors

Astrid V Stronen, Erin L Navid, Michael S Quinn, Paul C Paquet, Heather M Bryan, Christopher T Darimont

Abstract

Emerging evidence suggests that ecological heterogeneity across space can influence the genetic structure of populations, including that of long-distance dispersers such as large carnivores. On the central coast of British Columbia, Canada, wolf (Canis lupus L., 1758) dietary niche and parasite prevalence data indicate strong ecological divergence between marine-oriented wolves inhabiting islands and individuals on the coastal mainland that interact primarily with terrestrial prey. Local holders of traditional ecological knowledge, who distinguish between mainland and island wolf forms, also informed our hypothesis that genetic differentiation might occur between wolves from these adjacent environments.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 35 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 130 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 2 2%
France 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 126 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 34 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 15%
Student > Bachelor 16 12%
Student > Master 15 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 5%
Other 19 15%
Unknown 21 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 69 53%
Environmental Science 16 12%
Unspecified 3 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 2%
Social Sciences 3 2%
Other 7 5%
Unknown 29 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 118. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 January 2023.
All research outputs
#353,077
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#68
of 3,714 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,943
of 244,218 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#1
of 71 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,714 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 244,218 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 71 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.