You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
An observational study of associations among maternal fluids during parturition, neonatal output, and breastfed newborn weight loss
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Breastfeeding Journal, August 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1746-4358-6-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Joy Noel-Weiss, A Kirsten Woodend, Wendy E Peterson, William Gibb, Dianne L Groll |
| Abstract |
Newborn weight measurements are used as a key indicator of breastfeeding adequacy. The purpose of this study was to explore non-feeding factors that might be related to newborn weight loss. The relationship between the intravenous fluids women receive during parturition (the act of giving birth, including time in labour or prior to a caesarean section) and their newborn's weight loss during the first 72 hours postpartum was the primary interest. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 81 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 16 | 20% |
| United States | 15 | 19% |
| Canada | 5 | 6% |
| Australia | 4 | 5% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 1% |
| Nicaragua | 1 | 1% |
| Brazil | 1 | 1% |
| Costa Rica | 1 | 1% |
| Curaçao | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 5 | 6% |
| Unknown | 31 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 56 | 69% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 17 | 21% |
| Scientists | 7 | 9% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 113 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 2% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 110 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 26 | 23% |
| Researcher | 13 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 10% |
| Other | 9 | 8% |
| Other | 21 | 19% |
| Unknown | 21 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 41 | 36% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 27 | 24% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 9 | 8% |
| Unknown | 24 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 90. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 April 2022.
All research outputs
#476,869
of 25,556,408 outputs
Outputs from International Breastfeeding Journal
#10
of 614 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,686
of 131,637 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Breastfeeding Journal
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,556,408 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 614 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 131,637 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them