↓ Skip to main content

Economic downturns and male cesarean deliveries: a time-series test of the economic stress hypothesis

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
32 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Economic downturns and male cesarean deliveries: a time-series test of the economic stress hypothesis
Published in
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, June 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2393-14-198
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tim A Bruckner, Yvonne W Cheng, Amrita Singh, Aaron B Caughey

Abstract

In light of the recent Great Recession, increasing attention has focused on the health consequences of economic downturns. The perinatal literature does not converge on whether ambient economic declines threaten the health of cohorts in gestation. We set out to test the economic stress hypothesis that the monthly count of cesarean deliveries (CD), which may gauge the level of fetal distress in a population, rises after the economy declines. We focus on male CD since the literature reports that male more than female fetuses appear sensitive to stressors in utero.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Croatia 1 3%
United States 1 3%
Unknown 30 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 19%
Student > Master 5 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 13%
Student > Bachelor 2 6%
Professor 2 6%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 10 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 31%
Psychology 3 9%
Social Sciences 2 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 3%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 3%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 12 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 June 2014.
All research outputs
#14,052,992
of 23,798,792 outputs
Outputs from BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
#2,587
of 4,351 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#114,036
of 230,278 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
#64
of 90 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,798,792 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,351 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 230,278 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 90 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.