You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Practice of skin protection and skin care among German surgeons and influence on the efficacy of surgical hand disinfection and surgical glove perforation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Infectious Diseases, June 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2334-14-315 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Julian C Harnoss, Laura Brune, Jörg Ansorg, Claus-Dieter Heidecke, Ojan Assadian, Axel Kramer |
| Abstract |
Surgical hand rub and healthy skin are basic requirements to prevent surgical site infections. Nevertheless, there is little knowledge about the current practice of skin protection and/or skin care products (SP/SC) using among surgeons as well as a lack of data pertaining to the influence of SP/SC on the antimicrobial efficacy of surgical hand rub. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 51 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 10% |
| Researcher | 5 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 10 | 19% |
| Unknown | 15 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 33% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 13% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 8% |
| Environmental Science | 3 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 12% |
| Unknown | 14 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 June 2014.
All research outputs
#4,165,214
of 22,757,090 outputs
Outputs from BMC Infectious Diseases
#1,338
of 7,665 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,479
of 229,145 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Infectious Diseases
#30
of 169 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,757,090 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,665 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 229,145 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 169 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.