↓ Skip to main content

Collaborative care for patients with bipolar disorder: a randomised controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Psychiatry, August 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
334 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Collaborative care for patients with bipolar disorder: a randomised controlled trial
Published in
BMC Psychiatry, August 2011
DOI 10.1186/1471-244x-11-133
Pubmed ID
Authors

Trijntje YG van der Voort, Berno van Meijel, Peter JJ Goossens, Janwillem Renes, Aartjan TF Beekman, Ralph W Kupka

Abstract

Bipolar disorder is a severe mental illness with serious consequences for daily living of patients and their caregivers. Care as usual primarily consists of pharmacotherapy and supportive treatment. However, a substantial number of patients show a suboptimal response to treatment and still suffer from frequent episodes, persistent interepisodic symptoms and poor social functioning. Both psychiatric and somatic comorbid disorders are frequent, especially personality disorders, substance abuse, cardiovascular diseases and diabetes. Multidisciplinary collaboration of professionals is needed to combine all expertise in order to achieve high-quality integrated treatment. 'Collaborative Care' is a treatment method that could meet these needs. Several studies have shown promising effects of these integrated treatment programs for patients with bipolar disorder. In this article we describe a research protocol concerning a study on the effects of Collaborative Care for patients with bipolar disorder in the Netherlands.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 334 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 327 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 52 16%
Student > Master 52 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 36 11%
Student > Bachelor 30 9%
Student > Postgraduate 18 5%
Other 72 22%
Unknown 74 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 76 23%
Psychology 75 22%
Social Sciences 27 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 26 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 10 3%
Other 33 10%
Unknown 87 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 November 2011.
All research outputs
#4,425,271
of 24,962,233 outputs
Outputs from BMC Psychiatry
#1,705
of 5,304 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,618
of 127,656 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Psychiatry
#11
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,962,233 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,304 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 127,656 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.