↓ Skip to main content

RETRACTED ARTICLE: Clinico-histopathologic and outcome features of cutaneous infundibular keratinizing acanthoma: a case report and literature review

Overview of attention for article published in World Journal of Surgical Oncology, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
15 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
RETRACTED ARTICLE: Clinico-histopathologic and outcome features of cutaneous infundibular keratinizing acanthoma: a case report and literature review
Published in
World Journal of Surgical Oncology, June 2014
DOI 10.1186/1477-7819-12-173
Pubmed ID
Authors

Abbas Tavasoly, Hossein Gholami, Amir Rostami, Ali Anissian, Seyed Rashid Touni, Pooyan Khaleghian, Aram Mokarizadeh, Javad Javanbakht, Alireza Nasoori

Abstract

The infundibular keratinizing acanthoma (IKA) is a rare epithelial benign keratin-containing neoplasm of hair follicles. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the defining histopathologic architecture of IKA. A typical IKA consisted of a keratin-filled crypt in the dermis and subcutis that opened to the skin surface. Most of this tumor occurred on the back, neck, head, and the shoulders. Microscopically, the dermal nodules were focally contiguous in both the dermis and subcutis. Furthermore, most histological lesions are consistent with a simple or multiloculated cyst filled with keratin and lined by a wall of stratified squamous epithelium; keratin appears as a concentric lamellar mass, with a keratotic pearly aspect. Histological examination of the cutaneous lesions revealed that the growths were comprised of IKA. IKA of man and dog were compared, and it was concluded that although they are similar in many respects, they are not identical entities. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report on the prevalence of IKAs among the population of owned dogs in Iran.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 15 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 3 20%
Student > Master 3 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 20%
Researcher 2 13%
Librarian 1 7%
Other 2 13%
Unknown 1 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 6 40%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 7%
Unknown 4 27%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 June 2014.
All research outputs
#3,652,516
of 4,510,149 outputs
Outputs from World Journal of Surgical Oncology
#835
of 1,047 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#85,187
of 107,775 outputs
Outputs of similar age from World Journal of Surgical Oncology
#40
of 59 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 4,510,149 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,047 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 107,775 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 59 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.